Dental Implants Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Dental Implants, including details on dentistry, surgery, tooth implants. | ||||||||
|
Success and Survival of Single Dental Implants Placed in Sites of Previously Failed Implants.Grossmann Y, Levin L * Department of Prosthodontics, Oral and Maxillofacial Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel., † Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel., ‡ Periodontology Unit, Department of Oral and Dental Sciences, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. Background: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants. Methods: The study consisted of a consecutive cohort of 1,215 patients who received 1,387 single implants for single-tooth replacement during a 6-year period (1999 to 2005). Inclusion criteria were a single implant replacing a previously failed implant and follow-up data >/=6 months. Data were recorded and analyzed regarding implant survival and location, need for bone augmentation, and implant dimensions. Results: A total of 75 patients experienced the failure of 96 implants. Of those, 31 implants in 28 patients were replaced by a similar implant placed in the same location. Nine of the replacement implants failed, resulting in an overall survival rate of 71%. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 46 months (mean, 19.4 +/- 11.4 months). Replacement of maxillary and mandibular failed implants was similar. All failures occurred during the first year after implant replacement. On average, implant replacement occurred 5.8 +/- 5.2 months after original implant removal; three implants were placed immediately after implant removal. A third attempt for single implant replacement was made in two patients. However, one failed. Conclusions: Replacement of a failed implant presents a challenge to achieve osseointegration in a healed bone site and may result in a decline in the survival rates. Patients and clinicians should be aware of these results before a replacement attempt is considered. The success of replacement may be increased by the use of wider implants or with improved surfaces. Published 31 August 2007 in J Periodontol, 78(9): 1670-1674.
© 2004-2008 Dental Implants Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||