Dental Implants Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Dental Implants, including details on dentistry, surgery, tooth implants. | ||||||||
|
Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.Bittar-Cortez JA, Passeri LA, de Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Brazil. OBJECTIVES: Radiographic assessment of marginal bone height is included in longitudinal control of osseointegrated implants. However, accurate and reproducible results are difficult to obtain. The aim of the present study was to examine the differences between linear measurements in digitized radiographs (DR) and digital subtraction images (DSI) around endosseous implants and the interobserver variability. METHODS: The bone height around 30 implants in 22 patients was assessed by 5 observers. Standardized periapical radiographs were obtained just after the surgery and 4 months later. The radiographs were digitized and manipulated by means of EMAGO software, and linear and logarithmic DSIs were produced. Furthermore, the logarithmic subtraction was enhanced with the use of a filter. The observers had the DRs and three methods of subtraction to assess bone height. ANOVA statistical procedures were applied to analyse differences between the observers in the four assessed images and the Tukey test was used to evaluate the differences between the images. RESULTS: Comparison of the bone height assessments indicated significantly (P<0.05) higher values in the DR than the three methods of DSI. The observers also had a statistically significant variability in this assessment (P=0.00003). CONCLUSIONS: DSI demonstrated lower values of linear measurements of the bone height around endosseous implants, compared with DR. Interobserver variability should be considered when comparing values from follow-up studies. Published 26 June 2006 in Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 35(4): 258-62.
© 2004-2008 Dental Implants Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
