Dental Implants Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Dental Implants, including details on dentistry, surgery, tooth implants. | ||||||||
|
Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants.Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T Department of Periodontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden. AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants with a function time of at least 5 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Radiographs of 1346 patients who had attended annual follow-up visits at the Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Services, Gothenburg, Sweden were retrieved. Six hundred and sixty-two subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Thus, they all had been provided with implant-supported (Brånemark System) Nobel BioCare, Gothenburg, Sweden) fixed partial or complete dentures or single-tooth replacements with a documented function time in radiographs of at least 5 years. Implants that demonstrated progressive bone loss to a level of > or =3 threads of an implant were detected. The number of subjects who exhibited one or more implants with progressive bone loss to the threshold level was recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of 662 included subjects had one or more implants with progressive bone loss. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the individuals in this group carried a significantly larger number of implants than the subjects in whom no implants with progressive loss were detected (6 vs. 4.8). Furthermore, >30% of the subjects in the group with progressive bone loss had > or =3 identified implants and that about 33% of all such implants in this group exhibited extensive bone loss. Out of the total 3413 implants included in the study, 423 implants (12.4%) demonstrated progressive bone loss. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that the prevalence of progressive bone loss at implants assessed from subject-based data is higher than that evaluated from implant-based data. Published 24 August 2005 in Clin Oral Implants Res, 16(4): 440-6.
© 2004-2008 Dental Implants Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
